Dimond v. State of SC
Dimond v. State of SC
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7394
JO ANN DIMOND,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; CHARLES M. CONDON, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (CA-95-3678-2-23AJ)
Submitted: December 19, 1996 Decided: January 6, 1997
Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jo Ann Dimond, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying
relief on her petition filed under
28 U.S.C. § 2254(1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996,
Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110Stat. 1214, and denying her motion for reconsider-
ation. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no
reversible error. Additionally, we have determined that the dis-
trict court did not abuse its discretion in denying Appellant's motion for reconsideration. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the
district court. Dimond v. South Carolina, No. CA-95-3678-2-23AJ
(D.S.C. July 19, 1996; Aug. 13, 1996). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished