Kumar v. Cahill

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Kumar v. Cahill

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-2375

ALOK KUMAR,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ROBERT E. CAHILL,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-96- 2435-L)

Submitted: January 9, 1997 Decided: January 16, 1997

Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alok Kumar, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Alok Kumar appeals the district court's order denying relief

on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(1994) complaint. We have reviewed the rec-

ord and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Kumar v. Cahill, No. CA-96-2435-L (D. Md. Aug. 30, 1996). We dis- pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished