United States v. Sawyer
United States v. Sawyer
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7527
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
BENJAMIN SAWYER, JR., a/k/a Big Ben,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 96-7534
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
KEITH C. WARD,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CR-92-88)
Submitted: January 9, 1997 Decided: January 24, 1997 Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Benjamin Sawyer, Jr., Keith C. Ward, Appellants Pro Se. Charles Dee Griffith, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Benjamin Sawyer, Jr. and Keith C. Ward appeal the district
court's order denying their motions to reconsider its earlier denial of their motions to modify their sentences under
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district
court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Sawyer, CR-92-88 (E.D. Va. Sept. 4 & 17, 1996); United States v.
Ward, CR-92-88 (E.D. Va. Sept. 9 & 18, 1996). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished