United States v. Nichols
United States v. Nichols
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7019
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
DONAVON RAY NICHOLS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert J. Staker, Senior District Judge. (CR-94-21, CA-96-41-3)
Submitted: January 9, 1996 Decided: January 23, 1997
Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donavon Ray Nichols, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Farrell, Assistant United States Attorney, Huntington, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his
motion under
28 U.S.C. § 2255(1994), as amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996,
Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's
opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of
appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court.
United States v. Nichols, Nos. CR-94-21; CA-96-41-3 (S.D.W. Va. May
20, 1996). We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel
and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-
tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished