Trent v. Sheriff Lynchburg
Trent v. Sheriff Lynchburg
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7397
THOMAS JULIUS TRENT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SHERIFF OF LYNCHBURG CITY JAIL; W. SIMPSON; NURSE DAVIS; DOCTOR FOR LYNCHBURG CITY JAIL,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CA-95-281-R)
Submitted: January 9, 1997 Decided: January 23, 1997
Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas Julius Trent, Appellant Pro Se. Phillip Richard Lingafelt, GLENN, FLIPPIN, FELDMANN & DARBY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on
his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record
and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Ac-
cordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Trent v. Sheriff of Lynchburg City Jail, No. CA-95-281-R (W.D. Va. Feb.
28, 1996; Aug. 30, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished