Ewell v. Pruett
Ewell v. Pruett
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6997
STACY L. EWELL,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
SAMUEL V. PRUETT, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CA-95-1659-AM)
Submitted: January 9, 1997 Decided: January 23, 1997
Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stacy L. Ewell, Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. Anderson, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Stacy L. Ewell seeks to appeal the district court's order
denying relief on his petition filed under
28 U.S.C. § 2254(1994),
amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996,
Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record
and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the
appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Ewell v. Pruett,
No. CA-95-1659-AM (E.D. Va. May 24, 1996). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished