Thomas v. Burge

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Thomas v. Burge

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6739

DAVID RAY THOMAS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DAVID BURGE, Institute Doctor, Perry Correc- tional Institute; JAN WHITMIRE, Nursing Super- visor; ARTIE TAYLOR, Nurse, Perry Correctional Institute; MAYNARD BLAND, Institute Doctor, Perry Correctional Institute,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-93-2060-2-6AJ)

Submitted: January 9, 1997 Decided: January 21, 1997

Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Ray Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Vincent Clark Price, LOVE, THORNTON, ARNOLD & THOMASON, Greenville, South Carolina; Larry Cleveland Batson, Robert Eric Petersen, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). 2 PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Ac-

cordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Thomas v. Burge, No. CA-93-2060-2-6AJ (D.S.C. Mar. 25, 1996). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished