Solomon v. Warden
Solomon v. Warden
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6071
LEWIS HENRY SOLOMON,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
WARDEN, WALDEN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, T. Travis Medlock,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-94-2364-3-18BC)
Submitted: January 9, 1996 Decided: January 21, 1997
Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bernie Wellington Ellis, MCNAIR LAW FIRM, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attor- ney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
relief on his petition filed under
28 U.S.C. § 2254(1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996,
Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the
district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magis-
trate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a
certificate of probable cause to appeal; to the extent that a cer-
tificate of appealability is required, we deny such a certificate. We dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Solomon v. Warden, No. CA-94-2364-3-18BC (D.S.C. Dec. 12, 1995). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished