U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

Solomon v. Warden

Solomon v. Warden
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 21, 1997

Solomon v. Warden

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6071

LEWIS HENRY SOLOMON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WARDEN, WALDEN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, T. Travis Medlock, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-94-2364-3-18BC) Submitted: January 9, 1996 Decided: January 21, 1997 Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bernie Wellington Ellis, MCNAIR LAW FIRM, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attor- ney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L.

No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magis- trate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal; to the extent that a cer- tificate of appealability is required, we deny such a certificate.

We dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

Solomon v. Warden, No. CA-94-2364-3-18BC (D.S.C. Dec. 12, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.