Boggs v. SE Tidewater

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Boggs v. SE Tidewater

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-2506

MYRON BOGGS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SOUTHEASTERN TIDEWATER OPPORTUNITY PROJECT, a/k/a The Stop Organization,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-96-766-2)

Submitted: December 26, 1996 Decided: January 21, 1997

Before HALL, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Myron Boggs, Appellant Pro Se. James A. Gorry, III, Richard William Zahn, Jr., TAYLOR & WALKER, P.C., Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order granting summary

judgment to Defendant in this action alleging claims under

42 U.S.C. § 1985

(1994), and alleging violations of First Amendment

and privacy rights under the United States Constitution. We have

reviewed the record and conclude that this action is barred by res judicata. See Keith v. Aldridge,

900 F.2d 736, 739

(4th Cir. 1990). Accordingly, we affirm the ruling of the district court. Boggs v.

Southeastern Tidewater Opportunity Project, No. CA-96-766-2 (E.D.

Va. Sept. 25, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished