U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

Slappy v. State of South

Slappy v. State of South
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 31, 1997

Slappy v. State of South

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6443

ISAAC EUGENE SLAPPY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. C. Weston Houck, Chief District Judge. (CA-94-109-3-2-BD)

Submitted: January 7, 1997 Decided: Jan7uary 31, 1997

Before ERVIN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Isaac Eugene Slappy, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for a certificate of probable cause for appeal so that he may appeal the district court's dismissal of his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effec- tive Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214.

This court denied a certificate of probable cause for appeal and dismissed Slappy's habeas corpus petition in Slappy v. South Carolina, 92 F.3d 1181 (4th Cir. July 30, 1996) (No. 95-7725) (unpublished), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 65 U.S.L.W. 3353 (U.S. Nov. 12, 1996) (No. 96-6191). Thus, this appeal is moot. Accord- ingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.