Riley v. Weyerhaeuser Paper
Riley v. Weyerhaeuser Paper
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-2620
ELDON WAYNE RILEY, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WEYERHAEUSER PAPER COMPANY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, District Judge. (CA-94-11-3-MU)
Submitted: January 23, 1997 Decided: January 31, 1997
Before RUSSELL, WILKINS, * and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eldon Wayne Riley, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Max Daniel McGinn, BROOKS, PIERCE, MCLENDON, HUMPHREY & LEONARD, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
* Judge Wilkins did not participate in consideration of this case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 46(d). 2 PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his mo-
tion for relief under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). We have reviewed the
record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. Riley v. Weyerhaeuser Paper, No. CA-94-11-3-MU (W.D.N.C. Oct. 17, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished