Pouyan v. Smith

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Pouyan v. Smith

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1343

KOOSHA E. POUYAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DAVID M. SMITH; MIKE G. SHENIGO; AUTOMATED CONVEYOR SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District Judge. (CA-95-28-L)

Submitted: January 23, 1997 Decided: January 29, 1997

Before RUSSELL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Koosha Pouyan, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Cornelius Wood, III, Kristine H. Smith, EDMUNDS & WILLIAMS, P.C., Lynchburg, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Koosha Pouyan appeals the district court's order granting sum-

mary judgment to Defendants in this action filed pursuant to Title

VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-

2 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Pouyan v. Smith, No. CA-95-28-L (W.D. Va. Feb. 15, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished