Pouyan v. Smith
Pouyan v. Smith
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-1343
KOOSHA E. POUYAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DAVID M. SMITH; MIKE G. SHENIGO; AUTOMATED CONVEYOR SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District Judge. (CA-95-28-L)
Submitted: January 23, 1997 Decided: January 29, 1997
Before RUSSELL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Koosha Pouyan, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Cornelius Wood, III, Kristine H. Smith, EDMUNDS & WILLIAMS, P.C., Lynchburg, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Koosha Pouyan appeals the district court's order granting sum-
mary judgment to Defendants in this action filed pursuant to Title
VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-
2 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Pouyan v. Smith, No. CA-95-28-L (W.D. Va. Feb. 15, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished