UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-2022

ROBERT MATERSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus KATHERYNE E. STOKES, Area Director, EEOC Norfolk Area Office; BOB SIEZER, EEO Coordi- nator, Commonwealth of Virginia/Corrections Department, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CA-95-985)

Submitted: January 23, 1997 Decided: January 29, 1997 Before RUSSELL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Materson, Appellant Pro Se. Lamont Navarro White, UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Washington, D.C.; Ronald Nicholas Regnery, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIR- GINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Materson v. Stokes, No. CA-95-985 (E.D. Va. June 22, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED