Hill v. Novack-Hill

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Hill v. Novack-Hill

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-2526

RICKY HILL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DIANE R. NOVACK-HILL,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-96-35-2-BO)

Submitted: January 23, 1997 Decided: January 29, 1997

Before RUSSELL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ricky Hill, Appellant Pro Se. Diane R. Novack-Hill, Appellee Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing for

lack of jurisdiction his civil action seeking a standard paternity

test in an effort to overturn a state court child support order. We

have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hill v. Novack-Hill, No. CA-96-35-2-BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 11, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished