U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

Martin v. Chesapeake City Jail

Martin v. Chesapeake City Jail
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 28, 1997

Martin v. Chesapeake City Jail

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7460

WILBUR LEON MARTIN, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus CHESAPEAKE CITY JAIL; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. William T. Prince, Magistrate Judge. (CA-96-468-2)

Submitted: January 14, 1997 Decided: January 28, 1997

Before HALL and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wilbur Leon Martin, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion for appointment of counsel and dismissal of all criminal charges. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocu- tory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

We deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. Appellant's motions for trial and for collection of fees after his release are denied. We dispense with oral argu- ment because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pre- sented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.