U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

Warner v. Portman

Warner v. Portman
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 5, 1997

Warner v. Portman

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7598

SAMUEL MELVIN WARNER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus B. PORTMAN; J. MEURRENS, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-96-583-R)

Submitted: January 23, 1997 Decided: February 5, 1997

Before RUSSELL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Samuel Melvin Warner, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Samuel Melvin Warner, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Warner v. Portman, No. CA-96- 583-R (W.D. Va. Sept. 30, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.