U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

Nnoli v. State of Maryland

Nnoli v. State of Maryland
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 5, 1997

Nnoli v. State of Maryland

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7785

EMMANUEL NNOLI, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus STATE OF MARYLAND; WILLIAM C. MILLER, Honor- able Judge; PAUL H. WEINSTEIN, Honorable Judge; JAMES TRIMM, Master; RAYMOND M. KIGHT, Sheriff; ANDREW L. SONNER, Esquire; JOHN P. GALLEY, Warden, Montgomery County Detention Center; ALAN DAVID MEISELMAM, Esquire, and his law firm, Alan Meiselmam, Incorporated; ALAN J. NUTA, Esquire, and his law firm, Lan J.

Nuta, Incorporated; RICHARD S. MCKERNON, Esquire, or his estate; NNENNAYA NNOLI, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA- 95-2750-PJM) Submitted: January 23, 1997 Decided: February 5, 1997

Before RUSSELL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Emmanuel Nnoli, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Penny Whiteford, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore Maryland; Linda B. Thall, Senior Assis- tant County Attorney, David Eugene Stevenson, COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Rockville, Maryland; Robert William Hesselbacher, Jr., SEMMES, BOWEN & SEMMES, Baltimore, Maryland; Alvin Ira Frederick, ECCLESTON & WOLF, Baltimore, Maryland; Charles Stephen Rand, MCKERNON & RAND, Rockville, Maryland; Patrick J. Hoover, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Ac- cordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Nnoli v. Maryland, No. CA-95-2750-PJM (D. Md. Oct. 10, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade- quately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.