Nnoli v. State of Maryland

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Nnoli v. State of Maryland

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7785

EMMANUEL NNOLI,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF MARYLAND; WILLIAM C. MILLER, Honor- able Judge; PAUL H. WEINSTEIN, Honorable Judge; JAMES TRIMM, Master; RAYMOND M. KIGHT, Sheriff; ANDREW L. SONNER, Esquire; JOHN P. GALLEY, Warden, Montgomery County Detention Center; ALAN DAVID MEISELMAM, Esquire, and his law firm, Alan Meiselmam, Incorporated; ALAN J. NUTA, Esquire, and his law firm, Lan J. Nuta, Incorporated; RICHARD S. MCKERNON, Esquire, or his estate; NNENNAYA NNOLI,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA- 95-2750-PJM)

Submitted: January 23, 1997 Decided: February 5, 1997

Before RUSSELL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Emmanuel Nnoli, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Penny Whiteford, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore Maryland; Linda B. Thall, Senior Assis- tant County Attorney, David Eugene Stevenson, COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Rockville, Maryland; Robert William Hesselbacher, Jr., SEMMES, BOWEN & SEMMES, Baltimore, Maryland; Alvin Ira Frederick, ECCLESTON & WOLF, Baltimore, Maryland; Charles Stephen Rand, MCKERNON & RAND, Rockville, Maryland; Patrick J. Hoover, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Ac-

cordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Nnoli v. Maryland, No. CA-95-2750-PJM (D. Md. Oct. 10, 1996). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade- quately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished