United States v. Blagrove

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Blagrove

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7196

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ANTHONY A. BLAGROVE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CR-95-52, CA-96-599)

Submitted: January 23, 1997 Decided: February 4, 1997

Before RUSSELL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony A. Blagrove, Appellant Pro Se. William David Muhr, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Anthony A. Blagrove seeks to appeal the district court's order

denying his first motion filed under

28 U.S.C. § 2255

(1994),

amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996,

Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110

Stat. 1214, dismissing his next three

§ 2255 motions and denying his motion for appointment of counsel.

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis- trict court. United States v. Blagrove, Nos. CR-95-52, CA-96-599

(E.D. Va. July 11, 1996). Blagrove's motion for appointment of

counsel is also denied. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished