U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

Renshaw v. Feely

Renshaw v. Feely
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 4, 1997

Renshaw v. Feely

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7185

ROGER DEAN RENSHAW, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JAMES FEELY, M.D.; RON ANGELONE, Director, Department of Corrections; STERLING PROFFITT, Superintendent, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CA-96-615) Submitted: January 23, 1997 Decided: February 4, 1997 Before RUSSELL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roger Dean Renshaw, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion. We affirm, in part, on the rea- soning of the district court, Renshaw v. Feely, No. CA-96-615 (W.D.

Va. July 25, 1996), and because Renshaw failed to show that Appel- lees acted with deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. See Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 104 (1976). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.