Nuckles v. Clinchfield Coal Co

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Nuckles v. Clinchfield Coal Co

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1205

ARTHUR NUCKLES,

Petitioner,

versus

CLINCHFIELD COAL COMPANY; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,

Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (No. 94-0403-BLA)

Submitted: February 11, 1997 Decided: February 21, 1997

Before WILLIAMS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Arthur Nuckles, Petitioner Pro Se. Michael Francis Blair, PENN, STUART & ESKRIDGE, Abingdon, Virginia; Patricia May Nece, John M. McCracken, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's order

granting his motion for reconsideration and reaffirming the deci-

sion and order affirming the ALJ's decision to deny his application

for black lung benefits pursuant to

30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945

(West

1986 & Supp. 1996). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decisions are based upon substantial evidence and are with-

out reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the Board. Nuckles v. Clinchfield Corp., No. 94-0403-BLA (B.R.B. Feb. 24, 1995 & Jan. 25, 1996). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished