Nuckles v. Clinchfield Coal Co
Nuckles v. Clinchfield Coal Co
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-1205
ARTHUR NUCKLES,
Petitioner,
versus
CLINCHFIELD COAL COMPANY; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
Respondents.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (No. 94-0403-BLA)
Submitted: February 11, 1997 Decided: February 21, 1997
Before WILLIAMS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Arthur Nuckles, Petitioner Pro Se. Michael Francis Blair, PENN, STUART & ESKRIDGE, Abingdon, Virginia; Patricia May Nece, John M. McCracken, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondents.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's order
granting his motion for reconsideration and reaffirming the deci-
sion and order affirming the ALJ's decision to deny his application
for black lung benefits pursuant to
30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945(West
1986 & Supp. 1996). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decisions are based upon substantial evidence and are with-
out reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of
the Board. Nuckles v. Clinchfield Corp., No. 94-0403-BLA (B.R.B. Feb. 24, 1995 & Jan. 25, 1996). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished