U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

McKinney v. Perlado

McKinney v. Perlado
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 27, 1997

McKinney v. Perlado

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7541

JOHN MCKINNEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JESSIE PERLADO; ROBERT O. CARMICHAEL; JUDITH M. HAAS; SIMMS HUNTER RENTZ; PARKER EVATT, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CA-95-3433-2-22-AJ)

Submitted: February 13, 1997 Decided: February 27, 1997

Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John McKinney, Appellant Pro Se. James E. Parham, Jr., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

McKinney v. Perlado, No. CA-95-3433-2-22-AJ (D.S.C. Aug. 22, 1996).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.