U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

Wright v. Pena, Secretary

Wright v. Pena, Secretary
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 5, 1997

Wright v. Pena, Secretary

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1098

SAM WRIGHT, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FEDERICO F. PENA, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Defendant - Appellee.

No. 96-1429

SAM WRIGHT, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FEDERICO F. PENA, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis III, District Judge. (CA-95-1406-A)

Submitted: January 28, 1997 Decided: March 5, 1997 Before HALL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sam Wright, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Marc R. Hillson, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's orders granting the employer's motion to dismiss and motion for summary judgment in Appellant's civil action filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (1994), and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634 (1994).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wright v. Pena, No. CA-95-1406-A (E.D. Va. Mar. 15, 1996; Jan. 4, 1996). We dispense with oral argument be- cause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.