U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

Smith v. Holcomb

Smith v. Holcomb
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 13, 1997

Smith v. Holcomb

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7709

JASON L. SMITH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PAMELA HOLCOMB; JIM DOOLEY, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Magistrate Judge. (CA-95-359-R)

Submitted: February 27, 1997 Decided: March 13, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jason L. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Stacey Rae Moreau, WILLIAMS, STILWELL, MORRISON, WILLIAMS & LIGHT, Danville, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Jason L. Smith appeals the magistrate judge's* order granting Defendants summary judgment and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the magis- trate judge's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Smith v. Holcomb, No. CA-95-359-R (W.D. Va. Oct. 1, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* This case was presented to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to the consent of the parties entered under the authority of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1994).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.