U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

Hopkins v. Doe

Hopkins v. Doe
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 13, 1997

Hopkins v. Doe

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7458

LONNIE DARREL HOPKINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOHN DOE, Doctor; RON ANGELONE; DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Head of Office of Health Ser- vices; M.J. VERNON, Doctor; VERNON SMITH, Doctor; DOCTOR SHIFFMAN, Medical College of Virginia Hospital; DOCTOR BARNES, Powhatan Correctional Center Medical Department, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District Judge. (CA-95-1000-R) Submitted: February 27, 1997 Decided: March 13, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lonnie Darrel Hopkins, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Jack B. Russell, SANDS, ANDERSON, MARKS & MILLER, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant, Lonnie Darrel Hopkins, appeals the district court's order granting defendants' motions for summary judgment, denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint, and denying his motion for preliminary injunction. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accord- ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hopkins v. Doe, No. CA-95-1000-R (W.D. Va. Aug. 19, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.