U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

Williams v. Williams

Williams v. Williams
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 11, 1997

Williams v. Williams

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6891

SONIA WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CLARENCE WILLIAMS, Sheriff; MAJOR WOODY; ANTHONY DOWDY, Sergeant, Defendants - Appellees, and CAPTAIN NEWTON; LIEUTENANT SPENCE; SERGEANT BRANDT; SERGEANT SAUNDERS; DEPUTY SMITH; DEPUTY MARTIN; DEPUTY CARR; DEPUTY DEBUSKE; DEPUTY GUERRANT; MR. PENCILE; MR. CLARK; MR. MUTCH; DEPUTY BROWN, Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-95-100) Submitted: February 27, 1997 Decided: March 11, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sonia Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Latham Micas, County Attorney, Jeffrey Lee Mincks, Senior Assistant County Attorney, Stylian Paul Parthemos, Wendell Charles Roberts, COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Chesterfield, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Sonia Williams appeals the district court's order granting de- fendants' motion for summary judgment and dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) action. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we af- firm on the reasoning of the district court. Williams v. Williams, No. CA-95-100 (E.D. Va. May 16, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.