McCall v. Ray
McCall v. Ray
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7121
BOUNDARY MCCALL, Plaintiff - Appellant, and ERIC LEON WALTERS, Plaintiff, versus MICKY RAY; MR. GRAVETT; MR. SMITH; JOHN DOE, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. William B. Traxler, Jr., District Judge. (CA-96-1059-9-21JC) Submitted: February 27, 1997 Decided: March 11, 1997
Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Boundary McCall, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his action brought pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magis- trate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accord- ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. McCall v. Ray, No. CA-96-1059-9-21JC (D.S.C. June 28, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.