Smith v. Beck
Smith v. Beck
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-1455
SUSAN JEANETTE SMITH; DEBBIE MARCUS; DAWN SMITH, and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus ROY BECK, d/b/a Twin Peaks, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CA- 96-258-3-19)
Submitted: February 27, 1997 Decided: March 10, 1997
Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Susan Jeanette Smith, Debbie Marcus, Dawn Smith, Appellants Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellants appeal from the district court's order denying re- lief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Smith v. Beck, No. CA-96-258-3-19 (D.S.C. Apr. 22, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.