U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

Smith v. Beck

Smith v. Beck
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 10, 1997

Smith v. Beck

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1455

SUSAN JEANETTE SMITH; DEBBIE MARCUS; DAWN SMITH, and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus ROY BECK, d/b/a Twin Peaks, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CA- 96-258-3-19)

Submitted: February 27, 1997 Decided: March 10, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Susan Jeanette Smith, Debbie Marcus, Dawn Smith, Appellants Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellants appeal from the district court's order denying re- lief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Smith v. Beck, No. CA-96-258-3-19 (D.S.C. Apr. 22, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.