U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

Petrov v. AlliedSignal Inc

Petrov v. AlliedSignal Inc
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 10, 1997

Petrov v. AlliedSignal Inc

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-2789

NEIL PETROV, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ALLIEDSIGNAL, INCORPORATED; ALLIEDSIGNAL TECH- NICAL SERVICES CORPORATION, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA- 95-3846-DKC)

Submitted: February 27, 1997 Decided: March 10, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Neil Petrov, Appellant Pro Se. Stanley Mazaroff, VENABLE, BAETJER & HOWARD, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to the Defendants in this action alleging employment dis- crimination and failure to pay wages and benefits upon termination.

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Petrov v. AlliedSignal, Inc., No. CA-95- 3846-DKC (D. Md. Nov. 22, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.