Cockerham v. Trent
Cockerham v. Trent
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6597
MARCUS LEE COCKERHAM, Petitioner - Appellant, versus GEORGE TRENT, Warden, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, District Judge. (CA-95-310-1)
Submitted: February 27, 1997 Decided: March 10, 1997
Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marcus Lee Cockerham, Appellant Pro Se. Dawn E. Warfield, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston, West Vir- ginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110
We dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.
Cockerham v. Trent, No. CA-95-310-1 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 27, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.