U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

Armento v. City of Asheville

Armento v. City of Asheville
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 10, 1997

Armento v. City of Asheville

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1613

GREGORY G. ARMENTO, d/b/a Tradewind Marketing and Design, formerly known as Cumulus Creative Communications, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CITY OF ASHEVILLE; ASHEVILLE DOWNTOWN DEVELOP- MENT OFFICE; LESLIE ANDERSON, Director, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (CA-94-58-1)

Submitted: February 27, 1997 Decided: March 10, 1997 Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory G. Armento, Appellant Pro Se. John Henderson Hasty, George Bryan Adams, III, WAGGONER, HAMRICK, HASTY, MONTEITH & KRATT, Char- lotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment for Defendant in his action alleging a copyright violation and unfair and deceptive trade practices. We have re- viewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Armento v. City of Asheville, No. CA-94-58-1 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 26, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.