U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

United States v. Munoz

United States v. Munoz
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 20, 1997

United States v. Munoz

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7752

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus TANYA GLENN MUNOZ, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CR-93-146-BR, CA-96-664-5-BR)

Submitted: March 13, 1997 Decided: March 20, 1997

Before HALL, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tanya Glenn Munoz, Appellant Pro Se. Bruce Charles Johnson, OF- FICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying her motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court.

United States v. Munoz, Nos. CR-93-146-BR; CA-96-664-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Oct. 23, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.