Daughety v. Wamsley
Daughety v. Wamsley
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-2725
MAMIE DAUGHETY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DAVID WAMSLEY; MARYLAND HOMES FOR THE HANDI- CAPPED; EMERGE INCORPORATED; EMERGE INCORPO- RATED, Board of Directors, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-96- 2660-AMD) Submitted: March 13, 1997 Decided: March 18, 1997 Before HALL, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mamie Daughety, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Edward Tiller, WHITEFORD, TAYLOR & PRESTON, Baltimore, Maryland, Barbara Lee Ayres, WHITE- FORD, TAYLOR & PRESTON, Towson, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing her action alleging a violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-17 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Daughety v. Wamsley, No. CA-96-2660-AMD (D. Md. Nov. 1, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.