U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

Brown v. Moore

Brown v. Moore
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 18, 1997

Brown v. Moore

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7013

ERNEST BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MICHAEL MOORE; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Charles Molony Condon, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CA-95-2215-0-19BD)

Submitted: March 13, 1997 Decided: March 18, 1997

Before HALL, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ernest Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Ernest Brown seeks to appeal the district court's order deny- ing relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Brown v. Moore, No. CA-95-2215-0- 19BD (D.S.C. June 14, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.