U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

Booth v. Jordan

Booth v. Jordan
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 18, 1997

Booth v. Jordan

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7827

WILLIAM ANTHONY BOOTH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JEFF JORDAN, of the Montgomery County Sher- iff's Department, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Rockingham. William L. Osteen, Sr., District Judge. (CA-95-183-3)

Submitted: February 27, 1997 Decided: March 18, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Anthony Booth, Appellant Pro Se. Jack Michael Strauch, WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Booth v. Jordan, No. CA-95- 183-3 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 18, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.