U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

Walker v. Lamanna

Walker v. Lamanna
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 4, 1997

Walker v. Lamanna

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7784

HOMER W. WALKER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOHN J. LAMANNA, Warden; RODNEY TABRON, Unit Manager, in their individual capacity and personally, Defendants - Appellees, and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Defendant.

No. 96-7933

HOMER W. WALKER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RODNEY TABRON; JOHN J. LAMANNA; CHARLES MASSEY, in their individual capacity and personally, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Malcolm J.

Howard, District Judges. (CA-95-940-5-BR, CA-96-488-5-H(1))

Submitted: March 27, 1997 Decided: April 4, 1997

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Homer W. Walker, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Dickerson Kocher, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: In No. 96-7933, Walker appeals the district court's order de- nying relief on his action filed under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Walker v. Tabron, No. CA-96-488-5-H(1) (E.D.N.C. Dec. 4, 1996). In No. 96-7784, Walker appeals from the denial of relief on his Bivens claim alleging that the denial of his furlough request violated his right to equal protection. Our review of the record discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.