U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

Kerr v. Salyer

Kerr v. Salyer
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 4, 1997

Kerr v. Salyer

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7803

DAVID BOYD KERR, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JANET SALYER; WILLIAM HILL; GEORGE DEEDS; RICHARD YOUNG, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-962-R)

Submitted: March 27, 1997 Decided: April 4, 1997

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Boyd Kerr, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Kerr v. Salyer, No. CA-96-962-R (W.D. Va. Nov. 7, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade- quately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.