U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

Herrera v. Gee

Herrera v. Gee
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 4, 1997

Herrera v. Gee

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7822

PETER P. HERRERA, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ARCHIE GEE, Warden; J. HENNEBERRY, Director, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-96- 702-AMD)

Submitted: March 27, 1997 Decided: April 4, 1997

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Peter P. Herrera, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., At- torney General, Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Herrera v. Gee, No. CA-96-702-AMD (D. Md. Oct. 23, 1996). We dis- pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.