Herrera v. Gee
Herrera v. Gee
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7822
PETER P. HERRERA, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ARCHIE GEE, Warden; J. HENNEBERRY, Director, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-96- 702-AMD)
Submitted: March 27, 1997 Decided: April 4, 1997
Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Peter P. Herrera, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., At- torney General, Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
Herrera v. Gee, No. CA-96-702-AMD (D. Md. Oct. 23, 1996). We dis- pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.