Phillips v. Smith
Phillips v. Smith
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7672
KENNETH PHILLIPS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SEWALL SMITH; L. BISHOP, Secretary of Public Safety and Correctional Services; JOHN DOE, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, Senior District Judge. (CA-94-2312-HAR)
Submitted: March 27, 1997 Decided: April 3, 1997
Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kenneth Phillips, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Richard M. Kastendieck, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Ac- cordingly, we deny Appellant's motion for general relief and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. We also affirm the district court's denial of Appellant's motion to vacate judgment. Phillips v. Smith, No. CA-94-2312-HAR (D. Md. Aug. 28, 1996; Sept. 25, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.