U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

Slaby v. Berkshire

Slaby v. Berkshire
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 2, 1997

Slaby v. Berkshire

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-2352

ROBERT P. SLABY; LOUISE A. SLABY, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus WILLIAM D. BERKSHIRE; 1691 LIMITED PARTNER- SHIP; LANCER CORPORATION; CROFTON COUNTRY CLUB; JOHN DOE, Defendants - Appellees, and WILLIAM SPORRE; MARK SPOLARICH; NEIL T. BELL, Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Joseph H. Young, Senior District Judge. (CA-94-1633-Y) Submitted: March 27, 1997 Decided: April 2, 1997

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert B. Slaby, Louise A. Slaby, Appellants Pro Se. Lynn T.

Krause, KRAUSE & FERRIS, P.A., Annapolis, Maryland; Kathryn Miller Goldman, WEINER, ASTRACHAN, GUNST, HILLMAN & ALLEN, P.A., Balti- more, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellants appeal the district court's order entering judgment for Appellees on Appellants' claim alleging discrimination in vio- lation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101- 12213 (West 1995 & Supp. 1996). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Slaby v. Berk- shire, No. CA-94-1633-Y (D. Md. Aug. 6, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.