U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

United States v. Boardley

United States v. Boardley
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 17, 1997

United States v. Boardley

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7224

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus WARREN BOARDLEY, a/k/a Black, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CR-88-386-PN, CA-95-3222-JFM)

Submitted: February 25, 1997 Decided: April 17, 1997

Before WILKINS, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Fred Warren Bennett, CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY LAW SCHOOL, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. James G. Warwick, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiter- rorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104- 132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Boardley, Nos. CR-88-386-PN; CA-95-3222-JFM (D. Md. June 5, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.