U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

Ray v. DOWCP

Ray v. DOWCP
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 24, 1997

Ray v. DOWCP

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-2499

MARY ANN RAY, Widow of Hubert Ray, Petitioner, versus DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; CLINCHFIELD COAL COMPANY, Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (96-675-BLA) Submitted: April 17, 1997 Decided: April 24, 1997

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mary Ann Ray, Petitioner Pro Se. Christian P. Barber, Sarah Marie Hurley, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C.; Timothy Ward Gresham, PENN, STUART & ESKRIDGE, Abingdon, Virginia, for Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp. 1996). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Ray v. Di- rector, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, No. 96-675-BLA (B.R.B. Sept. 26, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.