U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

Tillman v. Coplin

Tillman v. Coplin
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 29, 1997

Tillman v. Coplin

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7768

KENT D. TILLMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MERRY COPLIN, Warden, Maryland Reception, Diagnostic and Classification Center; PATRICIA GOINS, Officer; C. SIMMONS, CCMS II; G. JONES, Correctional Officer, III; WILLIAM L. SMITH, Warden; JAMES B. MURPHY, Security Chief; APRIL NORTH, Chief Psychiatrist; UNKNOWN INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF M.R.D.C.C. AND M.H.C. ANNEX CLASSI- FICATION TEAMS AND DEPARTMENTS, All Defendants in their official and individual capacities, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA-96- 938-PJM) Submitted: April 17, 1997 Decided: April 29, 1997

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kent D. Tillman, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., At- torney General, Wendy Ann Kronmiller, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Tillman v. Coplin, No. CA-96-938-PJM (D. Md. Nov. 4, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.