UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-2486

SAM GREEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA, at Charlotte, Defendant - Appellee.

No. 96-2701

SAM GREEN, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA, at Charlotte, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, District Judge. (CA-93-346-3-MU) Submitted: March 31, 1997 Decided: April 29, 1997 Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sam Green, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Oregon Lawton, III, Associate Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Sam Green appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment for the the University of North Carolina at Charlotte (UNCC) in this employment discrimination action brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e, 2000e-2 (1994). UNCC cross-appeals the district court's order denying its motion to dismiss for lack of proper process and service of process. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion granting summary judgment and find no reversible error. Therefore, in No. 96-2486, we affirm the grant of summary judgment on the reasoning of the district court. Green v. Univer- sity of North Carolina, No. CA-93-346-3-MU (W.D.N.C. Sept. 23, 1996). In light of this determination, we find it unnecessary to decide whether the district court properly denied UNCC's motion to dismiss. Cf. Chesapeake Paper Prods. Co. v. Stone & Webster Eng'g Corp., 51 F.3d 1229, 1234-37 (4th Cir. 1995). Thus, we affirm in No. 96-2701 as well. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED