Mixon v. Mixon
Mixon v. Mixon
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-1203
JAMES P. MIXON, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CHERYL T. MIXON; RUTH N. MURPHY; FRED MURPHY, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CA-97-136-2, CA-97-137-2)
Submitted: May 1, 1997 Decided: May 8, 1997
Before WIDENER and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James P. Mixon, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his complaints as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and the dis- trict court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Mixon v. Mixon, Nos. CA-97-136-2; CA-97-137-2 (E.D. Va. Feb. 4, 1997). We deny Appel- lant's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.