Granofsky v. Baltimore Gas
Granofsky v. Baltimore Gas
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-1152
JANET GRANOFSKY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BALTIMORE GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY; ASPLUNDH TREE EXPERT COMPANY, Defendants - Appellees, and BF&M TEMPORARIES, Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. M. J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-93- 4175-MJG) Submitted: May 1, 1997 Decided: May 8, 1997
Before WIDENER and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Janet Granofsky, Appellant Pro Se. Luther Ellis Justis, Jr., BALTIMORE GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY, Baltimore, Maryland; Mark D.
Laponsky, Willis Gunther Ferlise, SEMMES, BOWEN & SEMMES, Balti- more, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's orders granting the Appellees' motions for summary judgment on Appellant's complaint, which alleged sexual harassment, gender discrimination, and re- taliatory discharge from her employment. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Granofsky v. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co., No. CA-93-4175- MJG (D. Md. June 10 and Apr. 1, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.