Yost v. Huffman
Yost v. Huffman
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7200
RICHARD ROY YOST, Petitioner - Appellant, versus P. L. HUFFMAN, Warden; JOHN B. METZGER, III, Chairman, Virginia Parole Board; VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-95-869-R) Submitted: May 1, 1997 Decided: May 7, 1997 Before WIDENER and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Richard Roy Yost, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Elizabeth Shea, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reconsideration of the denial of his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accord- ingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Yost v. Huffman, No. CA-95-869-R (W.D. Va. July 2, 1996). We deny Yost's motions for stay of the district court order pending appeal and for a certificate of probable cause to appeal. We dis- pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.