U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

United States v. Wray

United States v. Wray
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 7, 1997

United States v. Wray

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7712

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus BYRON LEE WRAY, a/k/a Slick, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Dis- trict Judge. (CR-89-127-D, CA-96-97-1)

Submitted: May 1, 1997 Decided: May 7, 1997

Before WIDENER and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Byron Lee Wray, Appellant Pro Se. United States Attorney, Greens- boro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magis- trate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Wray, Nos. CR-89-127-D; CA-96-97-1 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 18, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.