U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

DeBusk v. Hoechst Celanese

DeBusk v. Hoechst Celanese
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 7, 1997

DeBusk v. Hoechst Celanese

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1684

MICHAEL JAY DEBUSK, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus HOECHST CELANESE CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-95-602-R)

Submitted: May 1, 1997 Decided: May 7, 1997

Before WIDENER and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Jay DeBusk, Appellant Pro Se. Glenn Robert Goodwin, OGLE- TREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order granting Appel- lee's motion for summary judgment to enforce the arbitration deci- sion upholding Appellant's termination from employment, and denying Appellant's motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Ac- cordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. DeBusk v. Hoechst Celanese, No. CA-95-602-R (W.D. Va. Apr. 12, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.