U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

Harston v. Huffman

Harston v. Huffman
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 30, 1997

Harston v. Huffman

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7588

HERMAN E. HARSTON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus P. L. HUFFMAN, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-95-1294-R)

Submitted: May 15, 1997 Decided: May 30, 1997

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Herman E. Harston, Appellant Pro Se. Katherine P. Baldwin, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the dis- trict court's dismissal of his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny Appellant's motion for a certificate of probable cause to appeal, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Harston v. Huffman, No. CA- 95-1294-R (W.D. Va. Oct. 8, 1996). We deny Appellant's motion for production of documents. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.